I hope you enjoyed listening to Drs. Nancy Chick and Bill Cerbin discuss learning styles.
Here are a few questions for your consideration:
- Dr. Cerbin mentions several misconceptions about "learning styles," ultimately concluding that "learning styles" as we often think of them, do not exist: Do you agree? What have you found in your own teaching and learning that supports or undermines this?
- At about the 24-minute mark, Nancy summarized a useful response to misconceptions about learning styles as "thinking less about student's learning styles and thinking more about the ways of thinking that are required by my subject." What kinds of thinking are required by your subject? What are the most effective ways to teach students to think in these ways?
- Dr. Cerbin offers a few practices that enhance student learning: "free recall retrieval practice: "expressive writing" and "solution analysis." How might you use one or all of these in your courses?
- To paraphrase Dr. Cerbin's question in the podcast, what makes your field difficult for someone who doesn't know about it?
- What background knowledge do students need as a "framework" for your course?
Feel free to reflect on your own or leave comments below.